3. Existing technologies#
This section details data and assumptions on technical parameters of existing transport technologies, such as capital costs, efficiency, etc
3.1. Capital and operating costs#
3.1.1. Road transport#
Capital (CAPEX) and fixed operating and maintenance (FIXOM) costs for light vehicles in the model are primarily derived from EECA’s Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Tool[1] using a curated list of top-selling models across multiple technology types and vehicle categories. Vehicles are classified by category (e.g. car, SUV, ute, van, bus, motorcycle, truck), use type (e.g. LPV, LCV, bus, motorcycle, light, medium, heavy truck), and technology (e.g. petrol ICE, diesel ICE, hybrid, plug-in hybrid, battery electric vehicle, and hydrogen fuel cell). For each representative model, key cost components are recorded, including purchase price (capital cost), servicing costs, tyre costs, and a combined per-kilometre operating cost. Truck costs are sourced from publicly available sales data where possible, as well as aggregated internal EECA data. Dual fuel heavy trucks are determined by the price of the diesel truck plus $150,000 for the dual fuel system[2]. Operating costs were assumed the same as a diesel truck.
If vehicle cost data was not available in the TCO tool, we used proxy figures from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory[3] or the Argonne National Laboratory[4]. These costs do not include battery or fuel cell replacements, which may become significant in the cost of these vehicles given we are modelling their entire lifespan.
Vehicle Type |
Diesel |
Diesel Hybrid |
Diesel/Hydrogen |
BEV |
Hydrogen |
LPG |
Petrol |
Petrol Hybrid |
PHEV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPV |
53,565 |
48,087 |
69,630 |
60,836 |
37,907 |
42,201 |
52,065 |
||
LCV |
56,728 |
54,283 |
70,913 |
148,676 |
70,364 |
60,645 |
62,141 |
75,193 |
|
Light Truck |
78,244 |
89,981 |
126,271 |
211,896 |
238,692 |
||||
Medium Truck |
175,680 |
193,429 |
381,808 |
447,231 |
364,301 |
||||
Heavy Truck |
344,470 |
270,081 |
492,100 |
677,130 |
876,923 |
690,526 |
|||
Bus |
393,680 |
425,166 |
576,413 |
875,939 |
393,680 |
393,680 |
669,042 |
||
Motorcycle |
8,110 |
4,890 |
Vehicle Type |
Diesel |
Diesel Hybrid |
Diesel/Hydrogen |
BEV |
Hydrogen |
LPG |
Petrol |
Petrol Hybrid |
PHEV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPV |
0.09 |
0.06 |
0.1 |
0.16 |
0.07 |
0.07 |
0.08 |
||
LCV |
0.08 |
0.09 |
0.05 |
0.13 |
0.15 |
0.05 |
0.14 |
0.1 |
|
Light Truck |
0.14 |
0.14 |
0.09 |
0.14 |
0.14 |
||||
Medium Truck |
0.18 |
0.18 |
0.11 |
0.18 |
0.18 |
||||
Heavy Truck |
0.18 |
0.18 |
0.11 |
0.18 |
0.18 |
||||
Bus |
0.18 |
0.18 |
0.11 |
0.18 |
0.85 |
0.85 |
0.18 |
||
Motorcycle |
3.1.2. Shipping#
TIMES-NZ 2.0 did not include the cost of domestic and international shipping. For the 3.0 update we have used CAPEX and OPEX figures used in the Mærsk Mc-Kinney Møller Center TCO tool[5]. TIMES-NZ shipping technologies are based on Heavy fuel oil, so the most relevant category is Vessel 1 - ICE – LSFO (Low Sulfur Fuel Oil). Little reliable data has been found for alternative technologies.
Vessel |
2020 |
2025 |
2030 |
2035 |
2040 |
2045 |
2050 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAPEX (USD/Vessel) |
4,255,140 |
4,255,140 |
4,255,140 |
4,255,140 |
4,255,140 |
4,255,140 |
4,255,140 |
OPEX (USD/vessel/year) |
23,169,449 |
21,576,516 |
21,187,545 |
21,187,545 |
21,187,545 |
21,187,545 |
21,187,545 |
3.1.3. Rail#
There is also limited publicly available data for rail costs. Currently, we use data from media releases relating to the Stadler and KiwiRail contract for 57 mainline locomotives[6].
Type |
Fuel type |
No. of locomotives |
Contracted amount (million euros) |
Per unit cost (million euros) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mainline locomotives |
Low-emission diesel |
57 |
228 |
4 |
Hybrid yard shunt locomotives |
Hybrid battery-diesel |
24 |
No data publicly available |
3.2. Fuel efficiency#
Fuel efficiencies for base year technologies were determined based on historical information on actual fuel consumption, from the EEUD and vehicle travel data as described above. This is described in Equation (6) and the results are listed in Table 63.
Type |
Technology |
Fuel |
BVkt/PJ |
L/100km |
kWh/100km |
kg/100km |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPV |
ICE |
Petrol |
0.38 |
7.47 |
||
ICE |
Diesel |
0.31 |
8.34 |
|||
ICE |
LPG |
0.06 |
||||
ICE Hybrid |
Petrol |
0.53 |
5.34 |
|||
BEV |
Electricity |
1.56 |
17.84 |
|||
PHEV |
Petrol |
0.53 |
5.34 |
|||
PHEV |
Electricity |
1.56 |
17.84 |
|||
LCV |
ICE |
Petrol |
0.26 |
10.92 |
||
ICE |
Diesel |
0.27 |
9.62 |
|||
ICE |
LPG |
0.05 |
||||
ICE Hybrid |
Petrol |
0.36 |
7.67 |
|||
BEV |
Electricity |
1.19 |
23.32 |
|||
Light Truck |
ICE |
Petrol |
0.18 |
15.88 |
||
ICE |
Diesel |
0.14 |
18.18 |
|||
BEV |
Electricity |
0.67 |
41.53 |
|||
Medium truck |
ICE |
Diesel |
0.06 |
44.77 |
||
BEV |
Electricity |
0.3 |
93.79 |
|||
H2R |
Hydrogen |
0.11 |
7.75 |
|||
Heavy truck |
ICE |
Diesel |
0.05 |
55.2 |
||
BEV |
Electricity |
0.2 |
141.9 |
|||
H2R |
Hydrogen |
0.08 |
10.4 |
|||
Bus |
ICE |
Petrol |
0.13 |
22.58 |
||
ICE |
Diesel |
0.08 |
33.19 |
|||
ICE |
LPG |
0.02 |
||||
BEV |
Electricity |
0.31 |
89.56 |
|||
Motorcycle |
ICE |
Petrol |
0.69 |
4.12 |
||
BEV |
Electricity |
2.82 |
9.85 |
Some technologies weren’t present in the data so were determined manually – for LCV Hybrids and ICE motorcycles we used the relativity in between ICE LPVs and the LPV version of their respective technology.
Hydrogen trucks used publicly claimed fuel capacities and range to determine fuel consumption. For Medium trucks the Hyundai Xcient was used[7], for Heavy trucks the GBV Semi[8].
3.3. Lifetime of transport technologies#
To reflect differences in how vehicles exit the fleet over time, we allocated the total fleet across utilisation bands, referred to as tertiles based on their initial share and their expected survival as vehicles age. Each tertile’s base share is calculated from the overall fleet and adjusted using an age-based decay factor that models the likelihood of a vehicle remaining in the fleet as it gets older. The decay factor (\(\alpha\)) is defined as:
Equation (7): Age-based decay factor
This factor declines from 1 at age 0 to 0 at the maximum observed vehicle age.
We assume that vehicles which are used more regularly age faster. To allow for faster turnover in higher utilisation tertiles, the decay factor is raised to the power of the tertile index \(i\), resulting in the following weighting formula:
Equation (8): Utilisation weighting
These weights are then normalised within each age group to preserve total fleet size while reflecting different survival patterns across tertiles. Using this weighted distribution, the scrappage age is calculated for each vehicle type and tertile. This is defined as the age by which 70% of vehicles in that group have exited the fleet, representing a higher than median estimate of fleet turnover. It reflects differences in how quickly vehicles are typically retired across segments and provides insight into the upper range of vehicle survival patterns.
Category |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|---|---|---|---|
LPV |
28.12 |
27.08 |
20.77 |
LCV |
20.19 |
18.37 |
12.51 |
Bus |
37.5 |
20.72 |
16.05 |
Motorcycle |
22.48 |
19.87 |
18.23 |
Light Truck |
38.53 |
34 |
29.39 |
Medium Truck |
39.32 |
23.86 |
21.18 |
Heavy Truck |
39.32 |
23.86 |
21.18 |
3.5. Emission factors#
Emissions factors for each thermal fuel are sourced from the Ministry for the Environment’s Measuring Emissions Guide 2025[9]. These are all converted to kt CO2e/PJ equivalents using gross calorific values from MfE’s data for use in modelling. The electricity supply portion of the model will handle the electricity emission factor for transport electricity. The following figures are used in the model:
Fuel |
Unit |
CV MJ/Unit |
kg CO2e/unit |
kt CO2e/PJ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Petrol |
Litre |
35.18 |
2.42 |
68.79 |
Diesel |
Litre |
38.49 |
2.68 |
69.63 |
Fuel oil |
Litre |
40.74 |
3.07 |
75.36 |
Aviation fuel |
Litre |
37.19 |
2.52 |
67.76 |
LPG |
Litre |
26.54 |
1.62 |
61.04 |